Nebraska is no longer a 'forced-unionism' state

OMAHA – Throughout history, forced-unionism have majorly ruled employers in the United States. Collective bargaining (negotiation between Unions and employers) has been top priority for Union organisms, except for the railway or airline industry.

On May 12, 2011 Neb. Senator Johanns announced he signed the ‘Job Protection Act’ in order to conserve and recoil right-to-work laws. Consequent from Boeings shift in 787 production plant from Washington’s forced-unionism to South Carolina, a right-to-work state; the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) determined Boeing violated these “forced-unionism” laws by moving out of state.

Johann announced the “NLRB’s actions threaten businesses and workers in right-to-work states like Nebraska,” because “It’s simply wrong for a federal agency to dictate to a private company in which states they can set up shop and where they can’t. This is exactly the kind of overreach that will drive employers to send their jobs overseas rather than create jobs in” states like Nebraska (a right-to-work state.)

In appreciation to Johanns, more companies can decide to move in Nebraska and produce significant employment figures. This is convenient to just about everyone because previously, at the time employers decided to flourish in a particular state, forced-unionism kept those companies in the same location for years.

In public education, Teacher unions have always strongly opposed performance-based pay. However, in concordance with NLRB, unions can also tell employers where they should do business.

Therefore, it is a step forward in our free-enterprise system that employment and labor is not driven abroad, rather internally.

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Nebraska is no longer a 'forced-unionism' state - Omaha Political Buzz | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-omaha/nebraska-is-no-longer-a-forced-unionism-state#ixzz1MMw2Pob2